Punitive “incentives” to perform don’t even work in the short term, and in the long term actually foster the very culture such tactics are purported to eradicate.
Marc Tucker has written an excellent post on the failure of punitive accountability.
The working theory behind the Bush-Obama “reforms” is that teachers are lazy and need to be motivated by rewards and punishments and the threat of public shaming.
This is in fact a theory drawn from the early twentieth century writings of Frederick Winslow Taylor, who studied the efficiency of factory workers.
Tucker writes:
Let’s start by examining the premises behind the prevailing system. The push for test-based accountability systems to evaluate teachers have their origin in the work of a professor of agricultural statistics in Tennessee who discovered that differences in teacher quality as measured by analyses of student test scores over time accounted for very large differences in student performance. Many observers concluded from this that policy should concentrate on using these statistical techniques to identify poor teachers and remove them from the teaching force. At…
View original post 406 more words
0 comments on “Marc Tucker on Why Punitive Accountability Fails”